An Outstanding Volume on Ecclesiastes, with Russell Meek!

The Words of the Wise Are like Goads

The Words of the Wise Are like Goads
Engaging Qohelet in the 21st Century
EIS – Eisenbrauns
Edited by Mark J. Boda, Tremper Longman III, and Cristian G. Rata
Eisenbrauns, 2013
Pp. xi + 515, English
Hard cover, 6 x 9 inches
ISBN: 9781575062655
List Price: $64.50
Your Price: $58.05
www.eisenbrauns.com/item/BODWORDSO

Congratulations to my good friend Russell Meek for his contribution “The Meaning of hebel in Qoheleth: An Intertextual Suggestion,” in Eisenbraun’s new volume on Ecclesiastes in the 21st century. Read Peter Leithart’s comments on Russ’s article here. Overall, the book has a fabulous lineup of authors, and I am excited to read all of them. Here is the table of contents:

Preface vii
Part 1
Early History of Interpretation
Ecclesiastes in Premodern Reading: Before 1500 C.E. 3
Eric S. Christianson
Qohelet and the Rabbis 37
Ruth Sandberg
Ecclesiastes and the Reformers 55
Al Wolters
Sweet and Lawful Delights: Puritan Interpretations of Ecclesiastes 69
Cristian G. Rata
Part 2
History, Form, and Rhetoric
Determining the Historical Context of Ecclesiastes 89
Tremper Longman III
The Book of Qohelet “Has the Smell of the Tomb about It”:
Mortality in Qohelet and Hellenistic Skepticism 105
Leo G. Perdue
Qohelet and Royal Autobiography 119
Martin A. Shields
Framed! Structure in Ecclesiastes 139
David J. H. Beldman
The Poetry of Qohelet 165
John F. Hobbins
Part 3
Key Concepts and Passages
Epistemology in Ecclesiastes:
Remembering What It Means to Be Human 197
Ryan P. O’Dowd
“Riddled with Ambiguity”: Ecclesiastes 7:23–8:1 as an Example 221
Doug Ingram
The Meaning of hebel in Qohelet: An Intertextual Suggestion 243
Russell L. Meek
Speaking into the Silence: The Epilogue of Ecclesiastes 259
Mark J. Boda
Part 4
Language and Grammar
The Grammar of -? and ??? in Qohelet 285
Robert Holmstedt
The Verb in Qohelet 311
John Cook
“Aramaisms” in Qohelet: Methodological Problems in Identification and Interpretation 345
Eva Mroczek
Part 5
Interpreting Qohelet
The Theology of Ecclesiastes 369
Craig G. Bartholomew
Ecclesiastes and the Canon 389
Stephen G. Dempster
Fresh Perspectives on Ecclesiastes: “Qohelet for Today” 403
Iain Provan
Preaching Qohelet 419
Daniel C. Fredericks
Solomon’s Sexual Wisdom: Qohelet and the Song of Songs in the Postmodern Condition 445
Peter J. Leithart
Works Cited 465
Indexes 495

- Rusty Osborne

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Review of Return of the Chaos Monsters–And Other Backstories of the Bible

http://www.eerdmans.com/Content/Site146/ProductImages/9780802837462.jpg(Thanks to the folks at JETS for allowing me to re-publish this review online. It originally appeared in JETS 55/4 (2012): 836-38.)

The Return of the Chaos Monsters – And Other Backstories of the Bible. By Gregory Mobley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012, 155pp., $16.00 paper.

Fewer things have become more popular in Christian circles than talking about the Bible as story. In The Return of the Chaos Monsters – And Other Backstories of the Bible Gregory Mobley, professor of Christian Bible at Andover Newton Theological School, provocatively continues the conversation by presenting seven basic “backstories” that serve as the interpretive key for unlocking the significance of the Old Testament. Mobley’s backstories, which he defines as “implied or yet-to-be composed narrative[s] that [are] the necessary prologue to an existing story” (p. 9) all grow out of a worldview of Chaoskampf. In so doing, Mobley presents what he believes to be the metanarratives that gave rise to the Bible. These backstories are caught up in the deep structures of tale-telling that have captured human beings since the dawn of time.

Mobley begins his backstory biblical survey by examining the creation of the world according to the Babylonian Enuma Elish. The cosmic battle between Marduk and Tiamat illustrates that the Bible is built upon a worldview that saw all reality as struggle between chaos and order. In fact, both of these categories are built into the framework of creation. “Chaos is the raw material of creation,” (p. 19) and for this reason it keeps breaking lose all over the place when not kept in check. This is played out within the story of the Bible by God revealing divine commands that give order to the world and human beings are to function as chaos “co-managers” with God by keeping his commands (p. 23). Therefore Mobley argues that “Sin awakens the chaos monsters” (p. 22).

File:Marduk and pet.jpg

Marduk on a piece of lapis luzi (mid-9th cent. BC). Photo credit Wikimedia Commons.

From here it is easy to see how Mobley develops his backstory for Torah—“God has given humans an instruction manual for life on planet Earth so they can partner with God in the management of chaos” (p. 34), and the Former Prophets—“God has enacted the tough love of moral cause and effect” to encourage obedience, which in turn manages chaos. Mobley then works through the Latter Prophets highlighting the prophets’ mediatory role as divine anger managers, and then identifies the backstory of the Psalms as “Through praise humans release energy that augments God’s management of the chaos” (p. 97). Biblical wisdom is associated with humans catching glimpses of God’s chaos-managing blueprint that they can then choose to follow in order to subdue chaos. Lastly, Mobley turns to examine apocalyptic literature, which he argues, recycles the story back to its origin: “the only hope the faithful have during such tribulation is that God, as in the beginning, as in the oldest stories about divine heroes and dragons, can subdue chaos” (p. 137).

Mobley’s work is creatively communicated and imaginative. He writes with an energetic style and quip that are rarely observed in the world of biblical studies. And his articulation of the relationship between human sin and cosmic de-creation is very well taken. However, Mobley’s lively prose moves quickly from a playful pushing-the-boundaries to a troubling reality that there appear to be no boundaries—especially hermeneutical ones. Many biblical scholars have recognized that the creation story of the Bible contains polemical elements that seek to distance it from other ancient cosmologies. However, Mobley ignores such methodological sensitivity and wades forward in his chaos hunt assuming that the same human motivations that produced Mesopotamian tales are identical to those human motivations that produced the Bible. Mobley’s emphasis on chaos as an integrated part of the created world finds its ultimate—and disturbing—culmination in his dualistic assertion that at the end of all things, Satan will receive his commendation from the Lord, “well done my good and faithful servant” (p. 138).

Evangelical readers will likely find numerous other problems in Mobley’s work, such as his highly critical dating of biblical material, a derogatory dismissal of the doctrine of divine wrath, his frequent forays in Jewish mysticism, and his portrayal of a needy God who is sustained by the praise of his people. In many ways Mobley’s book embodies the dangers of philosophical intertexuality where all texts have a pretext—or, as he puts it “there is no single dry bone of a story” (p. 10). Mobley is right in that the biblical story points back to the beginning. But if God’s revealed Word is not the “dry bone” of the biblical story, then we are all simply left with our clever backstories and metanarratives. Thankfully, and to his credit, Mobley makes no claims of truth in his re-telling, but what a sad position to be in after the hard work of writing a book about the Bible.

- Rusty Osborne

 

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Welcome, Marginalia

I would like to extend warm congratulations to Charles Halton and Timothy Michael Law on the launch of their much-anticipated project, Marginalia: A Review of Books in History, Theology & Religion. The project boasts extensive, world-renowned advisory and editorial boards, and if the reviews already published are an indication of what is to come, then its readers are in for a treat. Marginalia is certain to become the place to go for  pleasurable, engaging, multi-faceted reviews of volumes in history, religion, and theology. Congratulations, gentlemen!

 

-Russ Meek

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Walton’s Guiding Principles for Comparative Study

File:British Museum Flood Tablet 1.jpgI recently re-visited this helpful list of guiding principles for conducting comparative studies using the Old Testament and surrounding ancient Near Eastern sources while preparing for a class on the historical-cultural backgrounds of the Bible. In his book (which I highly recommend)Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006), he spells out the following 10 principles to bear in mind when reading the Old Testament in its ANE context (p. 26-27). I don’t list these with the expectation that everyone out there is doing comparative research using primary material from ANE. However, if you are an academically engaged student of the Old Testament, you are reading books that contain arguments built on comparative studies from the ANE. So, for those reading the comparative work of others, use Walton’s principles to help you evaluate these arguments. Any comparative research that blatantly ignores or goes against these principles, should not be afforded much influence in our interpretation of the biblical text.

  1. Both similarities and differences must be considered.
  2. Similarities may suggest a common cultural heritage or cognitive environment rather than borrowing.
  3. It is not uncommon to find similarities at the surface but differences at the conceptual level or vice versa.
  4. All elements must be understood in their own context as accurately as possible before cross-cultural comparisons are made.
  5. Proximity in time, geography, and spheres of cultural contact all increase the possibility of interaction leading to influence.
  6. A case for literary borrowing requires identification of likely channels of transmission.
  7. The significance of differences between two pieces of literature is minimized if the works are not the same genre.
  8. Similar functions may be performed by different genres in different cultures.
  9. When literary or cultural elements are borrowed they may in turn be transformed into something quite different by those who borrowed them.
  10. A single culture will rarely be monolithic, either in a contemporary cross-section or in consideration of a passage of time.

- Rusty Osborne

 

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Practicing Textual Criticism

According to Paul Wegner, “textual criticism is the science and art that seeks to determine the most reliable wording of a text” (Paul Wegner, A Student’s Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods, and Results [Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2006], 24). Since evangelical Christians are interested in the Bible as God’s Word, then it follows that we must actively engage in finding out exactly what that Word is, to the best of our ability. After all, how are we to interpret a text if we are unsure what it says?

I just completed a comprehensive exam on Old Testament textual criticism that required me to write a paper that outlined some of the basic methods and practices of textual criticism, as well as the most common scribal errors that produced variant readings in the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. This paper will serve as a very basic primer on how to go about the task of textual criticism; for a more in-depth examination of the complex issues involved, see the works below.

 

Albright, William F. “New Light on Early Recensions of the Hebrew Bible.” BASOR 140 (1955): 27–33.

Cross, Frank Moore. “The History of the Biblical Text in the Light of Discoveries in the Judean Desert.” HTR 57 (1964): 218–99.

Dexinger, Ferdinand. “Das Garizimgebot im Dekalog der Samaritaner.” Pp. 111–33 in Studien zum Pentateuch Walter Kornfeld zum 60 Geburtstag. Edited by Georg Braulik. Vienna/Freiburg/Basel: Herder, 1977.

Freedman, David N. “Is the Shorter Reading Better? Haplography in the First Chapter of Chronicles.” Pages 685–98 in Emanuel: Studies in Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in Honor of Emanuel Tov. Edited by Paul Shalom, Robert Kraft, Lawrence Schiffman, and Weston Fields. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2003.

Hendel, Ronald. “Assessing the Text-Critical Theories of the Hebrew Bible after Qumran.” Pages 281–302 in The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by T. H. Lim and J. J. Collins. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. (Review here)

Junker, Hubert. “Konsonantenumstellung als Fehlerquelle und textkritisches Hilfsmittel im Alten Testament.” BZAW 66 (1936): 162–74.

Lundom, Jack. “Haplography in the Hebrew Vorlage of LXX Jeremiah.” HS 46 (2005): 301–320.

Klein, Ralph. Textual Criticism of the Old Testament: The Septuagint after Qumran. GBS: OTS 4. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974.

McCarter, Kyle. Textual Criticism: Recovering the Text of the Hebrew Bible. GBS: OTS. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1986.

Noth, Martin. Old Testament World. Translated by Isebill V. Gruhn; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1966.

Perles, Felix. Analekten zur Textkritik des Alten Testaments. München: Theodor Ackerman, 1895.

Pinker, Aron. “A Goat to Go to Azazel.” JHS 7 (2007): article 8.

Tov, Emanuel. The Text-Critical Use of the Septuagint in Biblical Research. Jerusalem Biblical Studies 3; Jerusalem: Simor, 1981.

_____. “A Modern Textual Outlook Based on the Qumran Scrolls.” HUCA 53 (1982): 11–27.

_____. “The Nature and Background of Harmonizations in Biblical Manuscripts.” JSOT 31 (1985): 3–29.

_____. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 3rd revised and expanded edition. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 2012.

Vodel, Friedrich. Die konsonantischen Varianten in den doppelt überlieferten poetischen Stücken des massoretischen Textes. Leipzig: Druck von W. Drugulin, 1905.

Wegner, Paul. A Student’s Guide to Textual Criticism of the Bible: Its History, Methods, and Results. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2006.

Würthwein, Ernst. The Text of the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Biblical Hebraica. 2nd edition. Translated by Erroll F. Rhodes. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.

 

Russell L. Meek is an adjunct professor in Old Testament and Hermeneutics at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Old Testament there as well. He also serves as associate editor of Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament.

Sharing:
Posted in Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Textual Criticism | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Old Testament on iTunes U

Here is a list of some of the free audio/video lectures and other materials related to the Old Testament freely available on iTunes U.

Unlocking the Old Testament (Elmer Martens, Fresno Pacific University) - A ten part audio/video lecture series on Old Testament theology. Four themes — deliverance, covenant, experiencing God, and land — are traced through three of Israel’s historical eras: pre-monarchy, monarchy, and post-monarchy.

Old Testament Survey I (Douglas Stuart, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) - Creation. Covenant. Kings. Behind those three words lie the beginning of time and the start of the unfolding of God’s eternal plan of redemption. Dr. Douglas Stuart, professor of Old Testament at Gordon-Conwell, takes you through the foundational material of the Old Testament as he surveys Genesis through Song of Songs.

 Old Testament Survey II (Douglas Stuart, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) - The story of God’s wandering people, Israel, and the prophets who call out to them can seem complex and confusing. In the continuation of his survey of the Old Testament, Dr. Douglas Stuart will help you gain an understanding of the structure and meaning of the second half of the Old Testament, as he provides an overview from the Psalms through book of Malachi.

The Pentateuch (John Goldingay, Fuller Theological Seminary) - The course studies the origin and historical value of Genesis to Deuteronomy; the different blocks of “law” and the principles they embody; the books as a narrative with a plot, characters, and themes; and their significance for Christian faith, life, and ministry.

The Prophets (John Goldingay, Fuller Theological Seminary) - The course studies the contents of the Former Prophets (Joshua to Kings) and the Latter Prophets (Isaiah to Malachi), their possible historical backgrounds, different approaches to their interpretation, and their significance for us today.

The Writings as an Introduction to the Old Testament (John Goldingay, Fuller Theological Seminary) – This course is a new addition and does not have a URL link yet. However, it is searchable in within iTunes.

Old Testament History (V. Phillips Long, Covenant Theological Seminary) - Former Covenant Seminary professor Dr. V. Philips Long explores the historical books of the Old Testament — Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings — including a brief look at the Pentateuch. Students will gain valuable insight into how to study and learn from these books of the Old Testament.

Old Testament Overview (Gregory Perry, Covenant Theological Seminary) - A survey of basic Old Testament Bible facts to provide a usable foundation for personal study, for ministry, and for other courses in biblical studies and in systematic and practical theology.

Old Testament Wisdom and Poetry (John Hutchison, Biola University)

Minor Prophets (David L. Talley, Biola University) 13 video lectures on the Minor Prophets.

Old Testament, Archaeology, and Theology (Harding University) – Lectures by John Walton, Dale Manor, Yosef Paz, and Terence Frethiem.

The Pentateuch (Richard Pratt, Reformed Theological Seminary) - This is a legacy edition of this course that should not be used if taking the course for credit. These lectures will help you interpret and apply the first five books of the Bible, which often seem distant and difficult to understand. You’ll get a sense for the literary structure of each book as well as the original meaning as inspired by the Holy Spirit. Special topics include the relevance of the OT, the concept of Law in the OT and NT, holy war, covenant theology, and worship. Take advantage of this unique opportunity to grow in your knowledge of these books and ultimately how they point us to Jesus Christ.

Isaiah – Malachi (Richard Pratt, Reformed Theological Seminary) - In this course, Dr. Richard Pratt surveys the entirety of the prophetic material in the Old Testament. He begins by examining the role and function of prophets, the types of prophetic genres found in Scripture, the connection of prophecy to the original audience and today, and the relation of prophecy to God’s character. This is followed by a close study of each prophetic book in its historical context, the meaning of the prophet’s words, and an inspection of their visions and actions as it relates to the original historical audience, believers today, and future events.

The Christian and the “Old” Testament (Walter Kaiser, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary) - Oftentimes we fail to see the unity of the Bible, much less the Old Testament. Therefore, we weaken our teaching and preaching of the individual passages. In this series, distinguished Old Testament scholar, Dr. Walter Kaiser, will present an overview that puts the whole plan of God into perspective with regard to each of the major sections of the Old Testament.

Literature and World of the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible (John Strong, Missouri State University) - Explores the religion, life experiences, cultures, thoughts, and history of the ancient Israelites as found in their literature and artifacts.

- Rusty Osborne

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

What Went Wrong in Genesis 3?

Michael Reeves, in his recent book Delighting in the Trinity: An Introduction to the Christian Faith, provides an nice Edwardsian theological assessment of the fall:

What, then, went wrong? It was not that Adam and Eve stopped loving. They were created as lovers in the image of God, and they could not undo that. Instead, their love turned. When the apostle Paul writes of sinners, he describes them as “lovers of themselves, lovers of money, . . . lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God” (2 Tim 3:2-4). Lovers we remain, but twisted, our love misdirected and perverted. Created to love God, we turn to love ourselves and anything but God. And this is just what we see in the original sin of Adam and Eve.

- Rusty Osborne

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A Theological Motivation for Open Access Research

Kevin L. Smith, from Duke University’s Perkins Library, nicely addresses the relationship between open access research and the field of theological study. In an article titled “Open Access and Authors’ Rights Management: A Possibility for Theology” (Theological Librarianship 2/1 [2009]: 45-56), Smith writes:

This inability to insure access for all brings us to the other reason we can no longer rely on traditional methods of distributing scholarship, and it is a reason unique, perhaps, to theological studies: the study of theology, carried on as it is from within a religious tradition and with the aim of supporting and fostering that tradition, includes a missionary impulse that no other academic discipline feels in quite the same way. To be sure, scientists and lawyers want their work to be seen by as many people as possible, which is why they adopt open access, but theological scholars write for a public that is broader than a particular academic discipline; they write for a “church universal.” Pastors are trained and sermons are preached throughout the world, so the works of biblical scholars and theologians have an audience well beyond the subscription list of any journal. Whereas a researcher studying a particular genetic abnormality may really know the names of everyone else capable of understanding her work, a theological scholar cannot possibly know about all of the people whose teaching, preaching, and faith journey could be impacted by her article, except in the most abstract sense. Yet all of those people are the true and legitimate audience for theological scholarship. (p. 49-50)

I believe Smith rightly identifies that the same motivations which have long prompted the initiation of theological study, should now drive the Christian research community toward open access publication of these materials. So, if you are an author, I would strongly suggest that you consider publishing your research in a peer-reviewed journal that is open access, or at least a print journal that will allow you to make your work available online. Charles Jones, at The Ancient World Online, has provided a mind-blowing list of 1,051 open access journals devoted to the field of ancient studies.  That said, be wise. Select a good editorial board with a robust review process, and publish your work for the world to read. - Rusty Osborne

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Israel’s Faith and the Historical Acts of God

Note: This is a guest post by Kent Capps, a dear friend, faithful pastor, and stout thinker. I believe his comments are a helpful reminder of the need to think about the Old Testament within a historical framework. – Rusty Osborne

In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul ties the validity of faith to the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus. “[I]f Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain” (v. 14). Again, “[I]f Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins” (v. 16). If Jesus did not rise from the dead in history, Paul says, then he has been misrepresenting God (v. 15), the Christian faith collapses, there is no hope beyond this life (v. 19), and Christians are a most pitiable lot (v. 19). Faith and hope are inseparably bound up with a miraculous historical event.

In recent times, it has become commonplace in biblical and theological studies to separate in the OT what Paul joins together in the NT. The validity of faith and hope for God’s people, the argument goes, simply cannot be tied to the actual historicity of an event such as the exodus. Since critical scholarship has thrown the historicity of such events into doubt, then the historicity of the events must not be necessary to the theological meaningfulness of the Old Testament narrative. The early events recorded in the Pentateuch are a literary convention designed to construct a meaningful theological story for Israel in her Ancient Near Eastern context.

It appears, however, that later reflection on the early Pentateuchal narrative within the OT itself, particularly the Psalms, does not permit this concession. For example, in Psalm 78, the psalmist reminds God’s people of God’s instruction to teach their children and not hide from them the “glorious deeds” and “wonders” that God has performed (vv. 4-6). The people of Israel had forgotten God’s works “and the wonders that he had shown them” (v. 11). Among these works and wonders was the exodus: “In the sight of their fathers [God] performed wonders in the land of Egypt, in the fields of Zoan. He divided the sea and let them pass through it, and made the waters stand like a heap” (vv. 12-13). There is no hint, of course, that the psalmist sees the exodus as a literary convention composed to give Israel a meaningful theological story. God performed these wonders “in the sight of their fathers.” The assumption seems to be that the exodus is a real and necessary historical event.

Biblical scholars often acknowledge these historical assumptions of OT writers–the writers were, after all, people of their times without the critical resources available to us–but suggest that their historical assumptions are not integral to the ongoing theological meaningfulness of Israel’s story. But this view would seem to strain the psalmists’ perspective on what grounds Israel’s hope. The psalmist appears to view the exodus in a similar manner to Paul’s view of the resurrection. Remembering God’s wonders that took place in the sight of Israel’s fathers not only discourages stubbornness, rebellion, and unfaithfulness to God (Ps. 78:8), but also encourages them to “set their hope in God” (v. 7). It seems, for the psalmist, that if God did not perform these works in history in the sight of Israel’s fathers, and if these works are not recounted to subsequent generations, then Israel’s hope collapses. Their faith becomes futile.

Similarly, Psalm 95:9 expresses dismay that the people of Israel had hardened their hearts and put God to the test at Meribah/Massah, “though they had seen [his] work.” In other words, the sight, the visible historical event, of God’s miraculous redemption should have led the people to trust in his future provision rather than to test him and to “go astray in their heart” (Ps. 95:10). There is a link between the historical event and the legitimacy of faith.

One more example should suffice. In Psalm 105, the writer encourages readers to “make known his deeds among the peoples,” to “tell of all his wondrous works,” and to “[r]emember the wondrous works that he has done, his miracles, and the judgments he uttered” (vv. 1, 2, 5). The parallel language to earlier psalms indicates that events such as the exodus are in view here, but the remainder of Psalm 105 places this beyond doubt, since the psalmist recounts the events leading up to and surrounding the exodus. The psalmist assumes that calling to mind these historical works of God evokes thanksgiving, praise, joy, trust, and obedience. Faith and its attendant responses to God  finds its grounding in real redemptive events.

Thus, the perspective of the indispensability of the historicity of God’s saving actions, whether it be of the exodus of Israel or the resurrection of Jesus, appears to be parallel across the testaments. Neither testament finds hope in literary conventions that are not tethered to real historical actions of God, no matter how “inspired” those stories may be.

Given these types of considerations within the OT itself, it seems a tall order to dispense with the historicity of an event such as the exodus without simultaneously pulling the rug out from under Israel’s hope itself. The historicity of the event and the validity of faith are inseparably bound together. Without the one there is no solid ground for the other.

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

JESOT 1.2 Just Released

I am pleased to report that Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament 1.2 is now available for open access viewing and dowloading at www.jesot.org. Here is the article and book review line up:

“The Election and Divine Choice of Zion/Jerusalem” by DAVID B. SCHREINER

ABSTRACT: This essay examines the fourteen passages in the Old Testament that mention that the Lord chose (בחר) Zion or Jerusalem. After briefly discussing the ideas of Zion/Jerusalem’s election throughout the Old Testament, this essay discusses each of the fourteen passages to determine the semantics and nuances. This essay concludes that these fourteen passages constitute a distinct ideological thread within the larger idea of Zion/Jerusalem’s election. Thus, scholars should exhibit more precision when invoking the passages of the Lord’s choice in discussions of Zion/Jerusalem’s election. In the second half, this essay discusses the historical-critical issues that surround each occurrence. Ultimately, this essay suggests that the demise of the ideology of the Lord’s choice of Zion/Jerusalem may be linked to the dissolution of the Davidic dynasty as a viable political option. This essay closes with a few thoughts on how this phenomenon testifies to the progressive nature of God’s revelation. 

KEYWORDS: choice, election, Davidic dynasty, Zerubbabel, centralization

“Wisdom Incarnate?: Identity and Role of אשׁת־חיל (“the Valiant Woman”) in Proverbs 31:10-31″ by JISEONG KWON

ABSTRACT: Understanding the identity of אשׁת־חיל (literally, “a woman of strength”) in Prov 31:10–31 presents various exegetical and interpretative issues. What is the rational way to look at the business woman’s characteristics? Should the life of the ancient successful woman which the Hebrew acrostic pragmatically portrays be recognised as speaking of social activities in ANE culture or should it be limited to religious virtues relevant to an Israelite community? Or perhaps, we can make an interpretive decision looking at it from both sides? Employing textual and literary approaches to find the persona of אשׁת־חיל (“womon of strength”), I argue that all the activities of the woman in the poem indicate the model of virtuous woman as well as of the mundane woman in a particular historical period and that אשׁת־חיל (“the valiant woman”) is used for a symbolic figure of personified Wisdom.

KEYWORDS: אשׁת־חיל (“the valiant woman”), Hebrew acrostic, hermeneutical model, personified Wisdom

“Abraham’s Tamarisk” by MATTHEW UMBARGER

ABSTRACT: Genesis 21:33 states that “Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba” without giving any explanation for this act. One possible explanation for the tamarisk’s significance, based on religious and magical uses of tamarisk in other ancient Near Eastern cultures, is that Abraham plants the tamarisk to zone off the area around his altar in Beersheba as an outdoor shrine.

KEYWORDS: Abraham, Tamarisk, Purity, Shrine, Magic, Ancient Near Eastern religion

“The Gibeonite Revenge of 2 Sam 21:1-14: Another Example of David’s Darker Side or a Shrewd Monarch?” by BRIAN NEIL PETERSON

ABSTRACT: Second Samuel 21:1–14 records the Gibeonites’ ritualistic execution of the seven sons of Rizpah and Merab. Many scholars insist that this account illustrates David’s brutality in his securing of the throne from the Saulides. Furthermore, chapters 21–24 appear to be chronologically disruptive to the Succession Narratives of 1 Sam 16–1 Kgs 2 with no real purpose other than to offer a few closing remarks on David’s kingship. However, David’s actions in 2 Sam 21:1–14 must be understood not so much as acts of wanton brutality and carpe diem but rather as the actions of a wronged man at the hands of Saul. What is more, David’s actions must not only be appreciated in light of ANE treaty-curses and their reversal, but also in light of the motifs of “settling scores” and of throne preparation and transition. In keeping with this latter motif, 2 Sam 21:1–14 fits thematically within the appendix of 2 Sam 21–24 and the greater rhetorical purposes of the complier of 2 Sam 21–1 Kgs 2:12. The picture that emerges from this material is one of a shrewd monarch righting past wrongs and preparing his kingdom for his successor.

KEYWORDS: Gibeonites; Second Samuel 21:1–14; Curse reversal; Succession Narratives; Merab

“Correlation of Select Classical Sources Related to the Trojan War with Assyrian and Biblical Chronologies” by RODGER C. YOUNG and ANDREW E. STEINMANN

ABSTRACT: Archaeological findings have added greatly to the credibility of Josephus’s citations of Tyrian records, in particular the list of Tyrian kings and their lengths of reign from 1000 to 786 B.C. and then from 593 to 532 B.C. Considerable skepticism remains, however, regarding the accuracy of another chronological datum that Josephus found in the Tyrian records, namely that Tyre was (re)founded 240 years before construction began on Solomon’s temple. The present study cites Pompeius Trogus/Justin and other classical authors that placed the refounding of Tyre immediately before the end of the Trojan War, thus bringing into harmony the date given in the Parian Marble for the fall of Troy, 1208 B.C., with the date for Tyre’s refounding as calculated from Josephus. Essential to this reasoning is the argument for the independence of the various sources that date these two events to the last decade of the 13th century B.C. Their independence, yet essential agreement, is compared to the weakness of the reasoning for the traditional date of 1183 B.C. for the end of the Trojan War. The precision of these various arguments is based on the firmness of the regnal dates of Solomon and his successors, as derived from biblical texts.

KEYWORDS: Old Testament Chronology, Josephus, Solomon, Hiram of Tyre, Tyrian King List, Trojan War

Book Reviews

Biblical Hebrew Grammar Visualized by Francis I. Anderson and A. Dean Forbes (Reviewed by M. J. Hamilton)

Blood Expiation in Hittite and Biblical Ritual: Origins, Context, and Meaning by Yitzhaq Feder (Reviewed by S. J. Park)

Human Consciousness of God in the Book of Job: A Theological and Psychological Commentary by Jeffrey Boss (Reviewed by J. E. Stewart)

Isaiah 40–55 by R. Reed Lessing (Reviewed by P. J. Long)

Key Questions about Christian Faith: Old Testament Answers by John Goldingay (Reviewed by I. German)

The Message of Kings: God Is Present by John W. Olley (Reviewed by G. Galvin)

Old Testament Wisdom Literature: A Theological Introduction by Craig G. Bartholomew and Ryan P. O’Dowd (Reviewed by J. M. Philpot)

Rethinking Rewritten Scripture: Composition and Exegesis in The 4QReworked Pentateuch Manuscripts by Molly M. Zahn (Reviewed by A. R. Meyer)

Right in Their Own Eyes: The Gospel According to Judges by George M. Schwab (Reviewed by D. S. Diffey)

Soundings in the Theology of the Psalms: Perspectives and Methods in Contemporary Scholarship by Rolf A. Jacobson (Reviewed by R. J. Cook)

Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible, 3rd ed. by Emmanuel Tov (Reviewed by J. Squirrell)

Writing and Literacy in the World of Ancient Israel: Epigraphic Evidence from the Iron Age by Christopher A. Rollston (Reviewed by D. B. Schreiner)

Sharing:
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment